Screw - or Cement - Retained Restorations

نویسنده

  • Stefan Holst
چکیده

laboratory trials have shown a potential detrimental effect upon the application of load, clinical long-term follow-up studies do not support such assertions, reporting comparable outcomes instead. Furthermore, arguments of increased rates of screw loosening and fractures in screw-retained abutments should be classified according to their publication date and the type of components used at that time (e.g. formerly used gold screws instead of currentlyused titanium retaining screws; cast instead of industrially manufactured prosthetic components). Cement-retained restorations on custom titanium or ceramic abutments, on the other hand, allow for the compensation of misaligned implants and can be treated like natural teeth. The non-disrupted morphology of the occlusal table may be considered a favorable aspect of this choice, eliminating the requirement for subsequent closure with composite resin and potential impairment of the esthetic outcome that occurs when metal-based frameworks are used. Zirconia-based frameworks, however, eliminate this disadvantage. If white or shaded substructures are used, then easy, fast and esthetically pleasing closure of the screw access channel can be achieved with conventional composite resin materials. The main disadvantages of cementretained restorations are the potential risk for cement trapping in the peri-implant tissues and retrievability difficulties when peri-implant tissue assessment and/or the maintenance of prosthetic components are required. Despite the fact that some studies suggest the use of temporary luting agents to make retrievability practicable, such protocols should be carried out with great care when implementing all-ceramic restorations. Although widely recognized for years, the detrimental effect that cement remnants can have on periimplant tissue health and integrity has only recently become the focal point of professional presentations and scientific articles. To reduce the risk for cement trapping, it is essential to position the height of the crown-abutment interface at, or slightly below, the gingival margin to allow for easy access and complete removal of luting materials. This prerequisite means that a customized implant abutment must be used in most cases. Screwor Cement-Retained Restorations

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Covering the Screw-Access Holes of Implant Restorations in the Esthetic Zone: A Clinical Report

Screw-retained implant restorations have an advantage of predictable retention as well as retrievability, and obviate the risk of excessive sub-gingival cement commonly associated with cement retained implant restorations. Screw-retained restorations generally have screw access holes, which can compromise esthetics and weaken the porcelain around the holes. The purpose of this study is to descr...

متن کامل

Survey of Screw-Retained versus Cement-Retained Implant Restorations in Saudi Arabia

Introduction Implant-supported prostheses are currently the standard treatment for the replacement of missing teeth and deficiencies. Implant restorations can either be screw-retained, cement-retained, or both. The implant retention system type is typically chosen during the treatment plan. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency of implant restoration retention system...

متن کامل

An alternative direct technique for the fabrication of an implant-supported, screw-retained fixed interim restoration.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Yilmaz et al Lautensack et al 7. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-28. 8. Okamoto M, Minagi S. Technique for removing a cemented superstructure from an implant abutment. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:241-2. 9. Chee WW, Torbati A, Albouy JP....

متن کامل

Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.

PURPOSE The present study was designed to compare the long-term outcome and complications of cemented versus screw-retained implant restorations in partially edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with bilateral partial posterior edentulism comprised the study group. Implants were placed, and cemented or screw-retained restorations were randomly assigned to the patien...

متن کامل

Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Optimal occlusion and esthetics are goals in prosthetic treatment. Implant dentistry is no exception. PURPOSE OF ARTICLE The purpose of this article is to discuss how the choice to use screw-retained or cement-retained implants dramatically influences the occlusion and esthetics.

متن کامل

Peri-implant bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess and compare peri-implant marginal bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS Electronic database and manual searches were undertaken to identify trials, prospective or retrospective studies reporting on radiographic marginal bone loss around dental implants restored with cement- and/or screw-re...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012